Linkedin invitation message to professor
Register Now for Nov. Audio files of 6 bullied targets telling their stories, offering advice to newbies. Stories that clarify, validate and inspire listeners. Sincethe Workplace Bullying Institute has developed comprehensive, evidence-based, and practical solutions for everyone — individuals to unions to institutions to lawmakers.
As democracy is perfected, the office of the President represents, more and more closely, the inner soul of the people. Sometimes I wonder whether the world is being run by smart people who are putting us on or by imbeciles who really mean it.
There is a cult of ignorance in the United States, and there has always been. The strain of anti-intellectualism has been a constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means that my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge. The Liar-in-Chief just threw out a new line. Three weeks. Three weeks in, Joe's shot! Let's go, Kamala, you ready? Most liberal person in [ After WWII, folk singer and activist Pete Seegerwho had served in the Pacific theater during the war, wrote a song that captured the insanity of reasonable people following orders from stupid people [ Discover the Breadth of WBI.
All Things Workplace Bullying. Click Here: Target Resources. Click Here: University. Click Here: Union Resources. Attorneys Click Here.
The History of Cyber Security — Everything You Ever Wanted to Know
Academia Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for academics and those enrolled in higher education. It only takes a minute to sign up. I am confused - how is this unprofessional and how can this be handled better in the future?
Here I quote the crux of your situation, and put in bold font your sentence containing a question:. It sounds to me that this is just the reaction of that particular professor, and so there's not much you can do about it.
Perhaps the professor only likes to use LinkedIn to connect with other researchers and professors, but personally I don't believe that it's unprofessional or inappropriate for university students to connect with professors. You are both adults and the site is intended for networking in the professional context. I myself added many of my lecturers on LinkedIn while I was an undergraduate, with no problems. If you'd added him on Facebook, that might have been a different matter, as many people want to keep their work and personal lives separate and would regard such a friend request as overstepping that boundary.
However, all you can do now is move on. In the future, perhaps only add professors that you have got to know quite well, as then they will recognise you if you request to connect, which in turn will hopefully mean they are less likely to refuse. Yea that's rubbish - most academics have huge networks on Linked In. Many of their contacts are former students who have remained active in their field. This is particularly the case among graduate students and academics in their department.
Personally I think if an undergrad made the effort to connect on Linked In I would take that as a sign that they were motivated and keen to continue working in whatever field it was that prompted the connection. If an academic is chastising a student for trying to build their professional and academic network - frankly I would just call them an idiot. Don't be deterred! Keep building your network but seek out the enlightened people who thrive on making connections.
Avoid the morons that refuse them It is totally fine to connect with your professors on Linkedin. You don't have to chat with them or comment on every post they upload but it is good to stay connected via social media in a professional way. I used to get requests from my professors on Facebook and LinkedIn, so I knew that they like to stay in touch somehow with good students. But again, try to not chat with them or comment a lot on their posts.The history of cyber security began with a research project.
A man named Bob Thomas realized that it was possible for a computer program to move across a network, leaving a small trail wherever it went.
A man named Ray Tomlinson yes, the same guy who invented email saw this idea and liked it. He tinkered with the program and made it self-replicating—the first computer worm.How to Get People to Accept Your LinkedIn Connection Requests \u0026 LinkedIn Invitations - Tim Queen
Then he wrote another program—Reaper, the first antivirus software—which would chase Creeper and delete it. How did we get from there to here?
Anyone remember the Orange Books? Network breaches and malware did exist and were used for malicious ends during the early history of computers, however. The Russians, for example, quickly began to deploy cyberpower as a weapon. Inthe German computer hacker Marcus Hess hacked an internet gateway in Berkeley, and used that connection to piggyback on the Arpanet.
He hacked military computers, including mainframes at the Pentagon, with the intent of selling their secrets to the KGB. He was only caught when an astronomer named Clifford Stoll detected the intrusion and deployed a honeypot technique. At this point in the history of cyber security, computer viruses began to become less of an academic prank, and more of a serious threat. Increasing network connectivity meant that viruses like the Morris worm nearly wiped out the early internet, which began to spur the creation of the first antivirus software.
Late ina man named Robert Morris had an idea: he wanted to gauge the size of the internet. To do this, he wrote a program designed to propagate across networks, infiltrate Unix terminals using a known bug, and then copy itself. This last instruction proved to be a mistake. The Morris worm replicated so aggressively that the early internet slowed to a crawl, causing untold damage.
The worm had effects that lasted beyond an internet slowdown. More importantly, this act also led to the formation of the Computer Emergency Response Team the precursor to US-CERTwhich functions as a nonprofit research center for systemic issues that might affect the internet as a whole.
The Morris worm appears to have been the start of something. After the Morris worm, viruses started getting deadlier and deadlier, affecting more and more systems.Dean Vincent Rougeau, inaugural director of the BC Forum on Racial Justice in America, on how institutions of higher learning can build a more equitable future.
Nationwide coverage of BC Innocence Program as they help uncover new evidence of innocence, prosecutorial racism, and other official misconduct that frees a woman wrongly convicted of murdering her parents in a fire.
Pat McCoy talks to Bloomberg about how Trump appointees in key regulatory roles may resist a Biden presidential agenda. More News. You are going to be learning from people who are constantly challenging themselves. Read more about Professor Oei. Read more about Professor Kanstroom. Read more about Professor Kaveny.
Read more about Professor Lyons. Read more about Professor Hong. Read more about Professor Madoff. Read more about Professor Brown.
Read more about Professor Ring. Read more about Professor Hashimoto. Read more about Professor McCoy. Read more about Professor Greenfield. Visit Our Campus. Skip to main navigation Skip to main content. The Chair In a long and storied career, Therese Pritchard '78 has remained true to herself. Previous Play Pause Next.
Law School. Playing Defense Pat McCoy talks to Bloomberg about how Trump appointees in key regulatory roles may resist a Biden presidential agenda. Featured Video. Social Media. Undo Influence? Professor Oei detects flaws in the new tax law's rulemaking process.
A Charitable Sleight of Hand Professor Madoff launches an effort to fix the wrongs of donor-advised funds. Hashimoto Investigates Opioid Crisis Our lawyer-scientist's research shapes national guidelines on overuse. BC Law: Impact. What Do Conservatives Believe? In the early days of the pandemic, I read a tweet suggesting that public health authorities seeking to overcome conservative skepticism about the virus should heed the lessons Act Like You Belong.
Because You Do. My grandmother ensured that my identity was a core value of my life. She often shared memorie I had just received my LSAT score as I was sitting at a car service shop with my laptop, waiting for an oil cA visionary report on the revitalization of the liberal arts tradition in the electronically inflected, design-driven, multimedia language of the twenty-first century. This collaboratively authored and visually compelling volume explores methodologies and techniques unfamiliar to traditional modes of humanistic inquiry—including geospatial analysis, data mining, corpus linguistics, visualization, and simulation—to show their relevance for contemporary culture.
If you want to know exactly what the digital humanities is, what refinements on traditional scholarly activities it offers, what new forms of knowledge making and knowledge sharing it makes possible, what long held truths or truisms it challenges, and what brave new worlds and nightmare scenarios it harbors, this is the book for you.
Hundreds of scholars and students today are rethinking the basic forms and norms of higher education. This book is a manifesto that helps to capture the energy of this work over the last decade in order to energize the radical transformation in modes of learning that needs to happen in the next one.
It engages with the striking variety of work now pushing the boundaries of work: web documentaries, dense mapping, humanities gaming, data mining, and critical curationjust to name a few.
Here you will find an expansive, generous picture of the future of scholarship, one built on core values of the humanities, but reaching out to quantitative work, to social scientific studies, to contemporary filmmaking and citizen documentation. Provocative, enthusiastic, and generative, it is a book that joins the humanities to our contemporary, digital world. Search Search. Search Advanced Search close Close. Add to Cart Buying Options. Request Permissions Exam copy. Overview Author s Praise Open Access.
Summary A visionary report on the revitalization of the liberal arts tradition in the electronically inflected, design-driven, multimedia language of the twenty-first century.
Share Share Share email. Mellon Foundation. Endorsements If you want to know exactly what the digital humanities is, what refinements on traditional scholarly activities it offers, what new forms of knowledge making and knowledge sharing it makes possible, what long held truths or truisms it challenges, and what brave new worlds and nightmare scenarios it harbors, this is the book for you. Cathy N. Davidson Codirector, Ph.Effective targeting will successfully harmonize mid-cycle path to purchase variables with the requisite interest-based and demographic variables, and empower advertisers to identify the most addressable audiences for media activation.
This shift in approach will help marketers and their agencies focus on brand effectiveness from the moment the media begins. Marketers who do this successfully will amplify the power of their digital creative and influence the most appropriate and receptive audience for their brand. Digital advertising has had its wake up call and can no longer hit the snooze button.
The industry has been jolted into action by the continued rise of ad blocking software across desktop and mobile devices, and forecasts of billions in lost advertising revenue.
We predict marketers will fight back with genuine improvements for consumers. More confident that UX basics will be addressed, publishers will be proactive in trying to win the hearts, minds and screen space of consumers.
Marketing campaigns will focus both on deterring new ad blocking users and discouraging existing users. The ethics of ad blocking will also be questioned as software providers increasingly attempt to profit from ad authorisation. Meanwhile, the technical ping-pong against ad blockers will continue.
This will return short-term dollars to publishers but will override consumer wishes, so the safer long-term strategy will be to address the core concerns which have drawn people to ad blocking. Expect to see the digital advertising industry urgently responding to these specific challenges throughout the coming year.
In a media landscape of ongoing dramatic change, advertisers will more aggressively adopt multiple media alternatives to reach and connect with their audiences throughout 2017.
Synergies will become more important than any single channel and the collective weight of all channels put together. Marketers will be focused on understanding the role each media plays within a broader plan and how they rub off to produce synergistic effects. The concept of synergies has been around for some time but what has changed is the planning aspect and the application of a discipline to the selection of channels to maximise its impact. These numbers are not only growing but increasingly we are seeing non-TV synergies emerging as advertisers and agencies start to get their heads around this.
But they offer opportunities for forming different kinds of relationships that meet consumer needs at different times and occasions. Optimising media duplication and phasing can go a long way in driving synergies but as a first step, marketers will need to ensure that every medium has a role to play within the broader media mix. At the top of the marketing to do list will be gaining a rapid understanding of the needs, aspirations and behaviours of Generation Z, also referred to as the post-millennials and centennials.
Brands will re-think their digital presence to emphasise co-creation, authenticity and transparency essential for connecting with Generation Z Brands will step up efforts to reach the emerging Gen Z consumer segment in 2017.
Marketers should invest in digital platforms to offer Gen Z consumers opportunities to interact and co-create. Transparency and imagination will be important as well as experimentation with augmented reality and virtual reality marketing to reach this highly imaginative and visual audience. Joline McGoldrick is Vice President of Insights and Product Marketing for the Media and Digital Practice of Kantar Millward Brown.
In 2017, successful brand stories will be built on delivering a consistent experience across touchpoints, and less on the number of touchpoints used. Michael Nicholas leads the Global Connected Solutions team at Kantar TNS, where he advises clients on digital and integrated marketing activities.The FC star said team-mates were happy to strip off in places across the cityHull FCHull FC's Gareth Ellis to conduct first round of 2018 Challenge Cup drawThe former Black and Whites captain will select the sides alongside former St Helens star Paul Wellens.
FacebookYouTubeTwitterPinterestA bankroll is the amount of money you have available to play poker. With this in mind, the information contained in this article is a guideline for your bankroll once you have become a winning player. The first thing you should know, however, is the difference between a "bankroll" and a "buy-in. Your bankroll is the entire amount of money you have available with which to play poker over a period of time.
It would be unwise to bring your entire bankroll at any one time or to use all the money you have with you to buy chips right off. Not only are there ups-and-downs during a single poker session but also ups-and-downs over a period of time. Your bankroll should tide you over the low periods. If not, then you need to think about how poker is affecting your overall finances. One more point about digging into your reserve when your chip stack is low.
In a regular game, it is never advisable to wait until your stack is depleted before buying more chips. If your stack is too low, you can't play with strength. It is better to buy more "ammo" (chips) before your stack gets low or end this particular playing session. It is not so much that you walk away from the poker table with something, it is that you won't play those chips from a position of weakness, which rarely wins.
To be able to walk away in this situation takes discipline, which marks the good players from the bad players. Bankroll-size suggestions range from 200 times the big bet at the level you are playing to 300 times the big bet. These amounts may seem like large numbers, but the fact is that even consistent winning professional poker players have downswings in their bankroll that may sometimes reach 200 times the big bet of the limits at which they are playing.
Any number of factors or a combination of factors may cause these downswings. They include a run of bad cards, poor play for one reason or another, poor game or table selection, or health issues.
It is recommended to start with 300 times the big bet. A lot of players play much better when they have this cushion. Some have played at levels in which they had less than 100 times the big bet in their bankroll, and it usually hurts their play. This is obviously a purely psychological hurdle, but when reduced to facts, it makes sense. Keep in mind that 50 times the big bet is a fairly common downswing and nothing to become too concerned about if you are still playing to the best of your ability.
Trying to just break-even when you are down is a thought that should never enter your mind. One last suggestion that is extremely important on your trip to becoming a successful poker player is record keeping.